01 · The experience
FinePrint
Six specialist agents working one company record through forty-one endpoints. You talk to one counsel; behind it, each agent works its own lane.
Built by founders, for founders.
We have needed proper legal counsel our whole working lives, and rarely been in a position to afford it. FinePrint is the thing we wanted.
Our mission
Every founder deserves a legal team.
Our mission is to give solo founders and startups the full legal coverage of a top-tier firm at the price of software — a legal AI model, agents that run the work, and licensed attorneys who review what needs judgment.
Not cheaper legal work. Coverage: somebody who knows the entity, holds the calendar, and catches the question before it becomes a problem. Well-funded companies have had that for decades. It should not be a funding milestone.
Why we built it
We are the customer we built this for.
We are entrepreneurs. We have started companies, hired people, signed things, raised money, and made the specific mistakes this product exists to prevent — not because we were careless, but because the help was priced for someone else.
You know the feeling if you have run a company without a lawyer on the inside. A contract arrives on a Friday and you read it yourself, because asking will cost four figures and take a week. A window closes that nobody told you about. Something you signed two years ago turns up in a diligence request, and you find out then what it actually said.
None of that is a hard legal problem. It is an unattended one. And for most of the companies we have built and worked with, it stayed unattended — not for lack of care, but because the only way to attend to it was to buy hours you did not have.
So we built the version we kept wishing for: legal work that runs quietly in the background on a record of what your company actually is, with real lawyers standing behind it, at a price a company can carry from day one.
We are not doing founders a favor. We are building the thing we needed, and we would like it to exist.
What we believe
Four commitments you can hold us to.
Each one is a decision already made in the product, so each is something you can check rather than something you have to trust.
-
Coverage beats answers
The record is the product. Workflows read it before they act and write back after, which is what makes it current by construction — not current the last time somebody tidied it.
-
Judgment stays human
Every matter carries a level, and the level decides who touches it. A system that never stops to ask is not confident. It is unsupervised.
-
You own your record
Export or delete it permanently, any day you choose. And the Two-Corpus Rule is absolute: OpenLegalLM learns from its contributors, never from your record.
-
Say what’s proven, and what isn’t
Three claims on this site are not yet published: the flag rate, which ships with the OpenLegalLM eval that produces it; the 90% comparison, which ships with its counting methodology; and reviewer independence, which ships with the network’s written standards. We could put a plausible number on each today. A quality metric you cannot audit is worse than none, because it retires the question.
How it’s built
Three layers, and they only work together.
FinePrint is the experience. The OpenLegal network is the judgment. OpenLegalLM is the intelligence. OpenLegal is part of FinePrint, so the people who review the work, the model their reviews train, and the product that runs on it are one company with one set of incentives.
02 · The judgment
The OpenLegal network
Licensed attorneys who review endpoint output continuously, and who take the matters that need a real engagement — included in your plan.
03 · The intelligence
OpenLegalLM
The network’s own legal AI model, trained on knowledge attorneys contributed and on the corrections they make. It rides the frontier bases rather than racing them.
Why the three have to be one company. A model without reviewers gets confidently worse and nobody notices. Reviewers without a product review other people’s output and keep none of the upside. A product without either is a template library with a chat box on the front. The loop is the thing.
The boundary
What we are, and what we are not.
We chose this line rather than being handed it. It is the reason the work can be trusted at speed, so we would rather state it up front than fold it into a footer.
A legal technology company.
We build software that runs a company’s legal work, we operate a network of licensed attorneys who review it, and we train a legal AI model on what those attorneys contribute and correct. “Counsel” names a function, and software can perform one. Every human word — lawyer, attorney, counsel of record — belongs to a licensed person, and we use them that way without exception.
Not a law firm, and not legal advice.
FinePrint does not provide legal advice, form an attorney-client relationship with you, or represent you. Where a matter requires legal judgment, a licensed attorney reviews it or takes it — engaged by you, with the scope shown before any work begins and the review included in your plan.
You will never see this product described as a lawyer of your own. It would not be true, and the phrasing quietly asks you to skip the one part a licensed human has to do.
Working with us
The legal team you were told you couldn’t afford.
One subscription. Run by AI agents, reviewed by lawyers, priced like software.
If you’re a founder: start with the free Legal Health Check. Connect the documents you already have and get one score with the exact list behind it — missing, doesn’t match, due soon.
Find my legal gaps — freeIf you’re a lawyer: review the agents’ work and contribute what you know. Paid per review, revenue share on knowledge that keeps working, and pay that never depends on approving anything.
Join the networkSee it run
One hire at a fictional startup, Monday to Friday. How it works
The record
Every signed document, indexed and yours to export. Legal DataRoom
The price
Five plans, for the company, from $99 a month. Solutions & pricing