01
Commercial
Paper in and paper out. Your NDAs, MSAs, order forms and data-processing terms, plus every counterparty agreement read against your playbook before you sign it. Owns the renewal and notice windows.
You talk to one AI counsel. Behind it, six specialist agents work the same company record through forty-one legal workflows — and stop, on purpose, wherever judgment belongs to a licensed attorney.
What an agent is
A chatbot takes your question and returns text. It knows nothing about your entity, holds nothing after the tab closes, and leaves the actual work — the approval, the signature, the filing, the ledger — exactly where it was.
A FinePrint agent reads the company record before it acts, runs the whole transaction, and writes the result back. That is the entire difference, and it is the reason the second matter is faster than the first: the record it wrote yesterday is the record it reads today.
Every run is bounded. The endpoint decides which facts are required, which approvals are needed, and which conditions send the matter to a lawyer. The agent doesn’t get to reason its way past any of them.
RUN /create-nda
counterparty: “Bay Meridian Logistics, Inc.” · type: mutual
purpose: pilot evaluation · term: 2 years · governing law: DE
✓read record — entity, signing authority, NDA position setMon 9:02
✓no prior agreement with this counterparty on fileMon 9:02
✓drafted mutual NDA — 11 clauses from the playbookMon 9:04
✓risk pass Green no non-solicit, no IP grant, term cappedMon 9:04
✓approved by you, then routed — 2 of 2 signedTue 4:19 PM
→writing back to the recordTue 4:20 PM
Green — executed inside two working days. One executed agreement in the Legal DataRoom, indexed to the counterparty. Confidentiality term and its expiry on the calendar. The draft went to the OpenLegal network anonymized, for continuous review.
Northwind Robotics and every counterparty named on this page are fictional, used to show a real workflow.
Before a word is drafted, the agent resolves the facts it needs out of the Company Legal Graph — entity, authority, cap table, existing agreements, the states you employ in. Missing facts stop the run and get asked for by name. Nothing is assumed.
Documents, the approval that makes them valid, the signature order, the government filing, the fee, the receipt. An endpoint is finished when the paperwork is executed and filed — not when a draft appears.
Executed documents land in the Legal DataRoom. The graph moves — headcount, pool, ownership, obligations. New deadlines appear in Today. Current by construction, because the write-back is part of the endpoint, not a chore afterwards.
Every endpoint carries the conditions that make a matter Yellow or Red. When one trips, the agent assembles the file and hands it to a licensed attorney with the scope on screen — before anything moves, and no fee attached.
A general-purpose assistant is shallow everywhere. Each FinePrint agent carries its own playbooks, its own jurisdiction rules, and its own escalation conditions — and reads the same single record as the other five, so the equity math and the employment math never disagree.
01
Paper in and paper out. Your NDAs, MSAs, order forms and data-processing terms, plus every counterparty agreement read against your playbook before you sign it. Owns the renewal and notice windows.
02
Hiring, classification, policy and separation — resolved for the state the person actually sits in, not the state you incorporated in. Owns the handbook and the offer set.
03
The entity itself: formation, the board, the cap table, the raise. Every resolution traced to the authority that permits it, and every share movement reconciled to the ledger.
04
The promises you make about data and the ones your contracts make for you. Notices rebuilt from what you actually collect, processing terms, transfer mechanisms, subprocessors kept current.
05
What you own, and whether you can prove it. The chain of title closed across founders, employees, contractors and any predecessor entity — then the registrations on top of it.
06
The recurring obligations nobody is assigned to remember. Annual reports, registered agents, franchise tax, state qualifications and payroll registrations — watched across every entity and every state.
Categories organize the catalogue; specialists own the judgment. More than one agent can work a single matter — a hire touches Employment, Corporate and Compliance in one run — and they coordinate through the record rather than through a conversation. Here is what each one reads, and the line it will not cross.
| Specialist | The record it reads first | Where it stops, and a lawyer takes it |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Your position playbook, the counterparty’s agreement history, entity and signing authority, insurance limits, the obligations already live in other contracts. | Uncapped or unusual liability, an indemnity outside the playbook, a customer’s paper that rewrites your IP terms, or anything that would bind a company you don’t control. |
| Employment & HR | Headcount by state, the plan and pool, the handbook version in force, existing classifications and the reasoning recorded with them. | A restrictive covenant from a prior employer, a classification that isn’t clean on the facts, a termination with a complaint behind it, or a reduction in force. |
| Corporate | Charter and bylaws, board composition and authority, the cap table and ledger, the current 409A, every prior consent and its date. | A priced round, a charter amendment that touches preferences, anything with a conflicted director, or a transaction that changes control. |
| Privacy, data & AI | What the product actually collects, the subprocessor list, existing DPAs and transfer mechanisms, the promises already published. | A cross-border transfer with no clean mechanism, a regulator’s inquiry, a suspected incident, or a data use your published notice doesn’t cover. |
| IP & brand | Assignment coverage per contributor, filings and their status, prior art and search results already on file, license grants in and out. | A gap in the chain of title, a conflicting mark, a demand letter, or a license whose scope decides how you can sell the product. |
| Compliance & risk | Entity registrations by jurisdiction, filing calendar and history, agent of record, payroll and tax accounts, receipts in the Legal DataRoom. | A missed filing with penalties accruing, a lapsed or revoked registration, a notice from a state agency, or an audit. |
An endpoint is not a template and not an answer. It is the whole transaction: the documents, the approvals, the signatures, the filings, and the record updated after. Here is every one of them.
Incorporation, founder stock, first filings
Board consents, minutes, approvals
Offers, agreements, contractor terms
Option grants, plans, 409A
SAFEs, notes, data rooms
NDAs, MSAs, DPAs, reviews
Assignments, trademarks, licensing
Filings, registrations, deadlines
Four plus six plus six plus six plus five plus six plus four plus four. The catalogue below is the same forty-one, written out, so you can check the arithmetic yourself.
| Endpoint | Name | What it runs, end to end |
|---|---|---|
| Formation · 4 | ||
| /incorporate | Incorporate the company | Charter, bylaws, initial board consent, share authorization, founder ledger opened, filing receipt to the Legal DataRoom. |
| /issue-founder-stock | Issue founder stock | Restricted stock purchase agreements, vesting schedules, consideration recorded, certificates issued and reconciled to the ledger. |
| /file-83b | File the 83(b) election | Election prepared, mailed with tracked delivery, receipt filed, the thirty-day clock watched from the day of purchase. |
| /obtain-ein | Obtain the federal EIN | SS-4 prepared and filed, EIN written to the record so every downstream filing and payroll registration inherits it. |
| Governance · 6 | ||
| /create-board-consent | Board written consent | Resolutions drafted from the record, routed in signing order, countersigned, minuted, and attached to whatever they authorize. |
| /hold-board-meeting | Hold a board meeting | Notice, agenda and resolutions prepared in advance; minutes drafted from what was actually approved and adopted at the next meeting. |
| /appoint-director | Appoint or remove a director | Consent, acceptance, indemnification agreement, board composition and authority updated everywhere the record uses it. |
| /appoint-officer | Appoint an officer | Resolution, title and signing authority written into the record — so later endpoints know who is permitted to sign what. |
| /amend-charter | Amend the certificate of incorporation | Board and stockholder approvals assembled, certificate of amendment filed, restated charter indexed as the operative document. |
| /authorize-shares | Increase authorized shares | The arithmetic checked against the cap table and the pool, approvals gathered, amendment filed, pool availability rewritten. |
| Hiring · 6 | ||
| /hire-employee | Hire an employee | Seven documents, the board consent for the grant, state registrations and filings, record and calendar updated. Broken apart below. |
| /engage-contractor | Engage a contractor | Agreement and statement of work, IP assignment, and a classification test recorded with the reasoning that produced it. |
| /convert-contractor | Convert a contractor to an employee | Prior IP chain closed out, offer set issued, classification history preserved so the transition is defensible later. |
| /appoint-advisor | Appoint an advisor | Advisor agreement, board-approved grant, vesting and any cliff placed on the calendar with the grant documents attached. |
| /terminate-employment | End an employment | Final-pay rules for the employee’s state, separation and release documents, equity treated per the plan, access and accounts closed. |
| /update-handbook | Update the handbook | The policy set rebuilt for every state you employ in, addenda generated, acknowledgments collected and stored against each employee. |
| Equity · 6 | ||
| /grant-options | Grant options | Grant notice and award agreement, board approval, strike checked against the current 409A, pool math written back to the record. |
| /exercise-options | Exercise options | Notice of exercise, payment and withholding, share issuance, ledger and cap table corrected on the same day. |
| /adopt-equity-plan | Adopt or amend an equity plan | Plan document, board and stockholder approvals, reserve set, and every existing grant re-checked against the new terms. |
| /order-409a | Commission a 409A valuation | Inputs assembled from the record, report filed, new strike price applied and the valuation’s expiry placed on the calendar. |
| /amend-grant | Amend a grant | Repricing, extension or acceleration — approvals gathered, amended documents issued, tax consequences flagged before you approve. |
| /repurchase-shares | Repurchase shares | Repurchase notice, board approval, payment and cancellation, ledger and cap table reconciled and the pool returned. |
| Fundraising · 5 | ||
| /issue-safe | Issue a SAFE | Terms set against the record, board approval, signature, and pro forma dilution written back so the next grant uses the right numbers. |
| /issue-convertible-note | Issue a convertible note | Note and purchase agreement, approvals, and maturity, interest and conversion triggers placed on the calendar. |
| /close-priced-round | Close a priced round | The closing set assembled, approvals and consents chased, shares issued, post-closing record and calendar rebuilt. |
| /prepare-data-room | Prepare a data room | A diligence room built from the Legal DataRoom against the standard request list — with the gaps listed before an investor finds them. |
| /file-form-d | File Form D | Federal notice filed on time, state notice filings identified for every investor’s state, receipts returned to the record. |
| Commercial · 6 | ||
| /create-nda | Issue an NDA | Mutual or one-way from the approved position set, signed, indexed to the counterparty, term and expiry on the calendar. |
| /review-contract | Review a counterparty’s contract | Read against your playbook, an issue list with your position and its fallback for each one, and a redline you can send. |
| /create-msa | Issue a master services agreement | The master terms and the order-form structure underneath them, drawn from the playbook and bound to your entity. |
| /create-sow | Issue a statement of work | Scope, fees, deliverables and acceptance, attached to the correct master agreement and inheriting its terms. |
| /create-dpa | Issue or negotiate a DPA | Processing terms, transfer mechanism and subprocessor list, kept consistent with the privacy notice you actually publish. |
| /renew-agreement | Renew, amend or terminate | Notice windows watched from the day of signature; the notice drafted and served in time, and the record and calendar updated after. |
| IP · 4 | ||
| /assign-ip | Assign IP to the company | The chain of title closed across founders, employees, contractors and any predecessor entity — with the gaps named where they exist. |
| /file-trademark | File a trademark | Screening search, class selection, specimen and application filed, and every prosecution deadline placed on the calendar. |
| /file-provisional-patent | File a provisional patent | Inventor declarations and assignments, the provisional filed, and the twelve-month conversion clock watched from the filing date. |
| /license-ip | License IP in or out | Grant scope, field, territory and term set explicitly — plus the obligations that survive termination, written into the record. |
| Compliance · 4 | ||
| /annual-compliance | Run the annual set | Annual report, registered agent, annual minutes and every recurring obligation the entity owes — filed, paid, receipted. |
| /foreign-qualify | Qualify in a new state | Statement of authority filed, registered agent appointed, payroll and tax accounts registered, and the new state’s calendar started. |
| /file-franchise-tax | File franchise tax | Both calculation methods run, the cheaper one filed and paid, receipt to the Legal DataRoom, next year’s date already set. |
| /publish-privacy-policy | Publish or update the privacy policy | The notice rebuilt from what the product actually collects, with the disclosures each state requires and a dated version history. |
Anatomy of one endpoint
Northwind Robotics is hiring Sarah Kim, a senior robotics engineer working remotely from Denver — the company’s first Colorado employee. One hire is seven documents, a board written consent, and four Colorado registrations. Here is the run, frame by frame.
The agent resolves the facts before it decides anything: the option pool has 387,500 shares available, the 409A dated May 12 2026 sets the strike at $0.63, and the board has authority to approve grants by written consent. Colorado is new — the company has no registration there.
Out of those facts comes a plan you can read: seven documents, one board approval, four filings and registrations. Nothing starts until you approve it.
One question can’t be answered from the record — Sarah has a restrictive covenant with a previous employer. That condition makes the matter Yellow before any drafting begins.
The offer letter, the confidential information and invention assignment agreement, the Colorado restrictive-covenant notice, the at-will and arbitration acknowledgment, the handbook acknowledgment with its Colorado addendum, the option grant notice, and the option award agreement under the plan.
They agree with each other because they were drawn from one record: the same salary, the same 85,000 options at $0.63, the same four-year vest with a one-year cliff, the same September 14 start date. The board written consent that authorizes the grant is routed separately and signed by all three directors.
The Yellow question went to J. Alvarez — employment, Colorado — scope approved Monday 9:31 AM, cleared Wednesday 11:40 AM, at no cost beyond the subscription. A narrow twelve-month customer non-solicit, no bar to the hire, one onboarding guardrail added to the invention assignment.
Hiring in Colorado means registering there. The agent runs /foreign-qualify as part of the same matter: the Statement of Foreign Entity Authority with the Colorado Secretary of State, then payroll registrations for wage withholding, unemployment insurance and FAMLI, then the workers’ compensation endorsement.
Each receipt lands in the Legal DataRoom as it arrives. Then the record moves: employees 12 → 13, pool available 387,500 → 302,500, and Colorado’s recurring deadlines start appearing in Today. The offer went out Thursday — a day early.
| Stage | What the endpoint handles |
|---|---|
| Facts it gathers | Name, role, work location and start date · compensation and equity · the pool and its availability · the 409A in force and its expiry · board composition and authority · the states already registered · any restrictive covenant the candidate discloses. |
| Documents it produces | Offer letter · confidential information and invention assignment agreement · Colorado restrictive-covenant notice · at-will and arbitration acknowledgment · handbook and policy acknowledgment with state addendum · option grant notice · option award agreement. |
| Approval it requires | A board written consent authorizing the grant — resolutions drafted from the plan, routed to all three directors, executed and attached to the grant documents it authorizes. |
| Filings and registrations | Statement of Foreign Entity Authority (Colorado Secretary of State) · wage withholding account · unemployment insurance account · FAMLI registration · workers’ compensation endorsement. |
| Where a lawyer enters | The prior restrictive covenant. The attorney and the scope on screen before the attorney starts, with the review included in the plan; the answer and the guardrail it produced stored with the matter. |
| What it writes back | Seven executed documents, the board written consent, and every filing receipt as it lands — all to the Legal DataRoom · employees 12 → 13 · pool available 387,500 → 302,500 · Colorado added to the entity’s registered jurisdictions · quarterly unemployment, FAMLI and annual report dates added to Today. |
Every endpoint carries the conditions that decide who touches a matter. The level isn’t a mood — it’s a rule the agent cannot argue with.
Standard work with complete facts runs end to end, with your approval. And the network keeps standing watch: reviewers score the output continuously, so every flag makes the endpoint sharper for every company.
The question is outside what the model has been taught, so the endpoint stops and routes it to the network. A licensed attorney answers it before anything moves, included in your plan — as with Sarah Kim’s restrictive covenant, approved in seventeen minutes and cleared in two days. The answer then joins what OpenLegalLM knows.
A financing, a dispute, a regulated question. The specialist takes the matter with the file already built — the record, the documents, the history and the issue list, assembled before the first call.
The most important thing the system knows is when it doesn’t know. Nothing starts until you approve it, and at every point where judgment matters, the judgment is a licensed attorney’s.
The boundary
Any system that runs legal work should be as clear about its limits as its capabilities. These are ours, stated plainly, and they are enforced in the product rather than promised in a policy.
FinePrint is a legal technology company, not a law firm. The agents produce documents, approvals and filings from your record. Where a matter requires legal judgment, a licensed attorney reviews it or takes it — engaged by you, with the scope shown first and the review included in your plan.
An agent can tell you that a term is outside your playbook, what the usual fallback is, and that a lawyer has to decide it. It cannot hold the call itself. When a level trips, the file goes to a person — no override, no confidence threshold that lets it through.
No filings on your behalf in a dispute, no representation, no appearances, no negotiation of a matter in litigation. Government filings are ministerial: registrations, reports, notices — the paperwork a company owes, filed on time.
Nothing is signed, sent, filed or paid until you approve that specific step. The plan is on screen before the run starts, and a matter that brings in a lawyer shows the attorney and the scope before the engagement exists.
The Two-Corpus Rule: OpenLegalLM learns from its contributors, never from your record. Your documents are retrieved for your matters and are never training material for a shared model. Work that goes to the network for continuous review is anonymized through the Clean Room pipeline first.
An endpoint stops when a required fact is missing rather than guessing at it, and it will not run in a jurisdiction whose rules it does not carry. A refusal to proceed is a result, and it is written to the matter with its reason.
An assistant answers from general knowledge and forgets you afterwards. An agent reads your company record before it acts — your charter, your board authority, your pool, your existing agreements, the states you employ in — and writes the outcome back to that record when it’s done.
The practical difference is what you hold at the end. An assistant leaves you with text. An endpoint leaves you with executed documents, a filed registration, a receipt, and a company record that now says something different than it did this morning.
It stops and says so. A missing fact is asked for by name rather than assumed. A condition the endpoint marks Yellow or Red routes the matter to a licensed attorney with the file already assembled, and the attorney and the scope appear on screen before anything moves, with no fee attached.
You approve the plan before the run starts, and you approve any step that signs, sends, files or pays. Between those points the agent works without interruption. Nothing that binds the company or spends money happens on its own.
Licensed attorneys in the OpenLegal network, in two modes. Continuous review: Green output is anonymized through the Clean Room pipeline, sampled, scored and flagged — like production code review. Matter review: Yellow and Red matters go to a conflict-checked attorney you engage, with the scope on screen first. Either way it is included in your plan.
Reviewers are paid per review, and their pay is never contingent on approving anything. The application side cannot override a reviewer’s flag.
The catalogue is forty-one today, and it grows the way the rest of the system does: an attorney in the network contributes the playbook and the positions, the endpoint is built around deterministic rules, and it ships only after it passes evaluation. Business and Enterprise plans include API access and custom policies for work that sits outside the standard set.
Every plan includes credits, and endpoints draw credits as they run — from $99 a month for the company, not per seat. Attorney review is included: a matter that needs a lawyer costs nothing beyond it. Government fees are passed through at cost.
No. The Two-Corpus Rule is the whole answer: OpenLegalLM learns from what its contributors give it, never from your record. Your data sits encrypted and company-isolated with per-document keys, and you can export or permanently delete it any time.
Start with what your record already says about you.
Run the free Legal Health Check. Connect the documents you already have; in about four minutes, one score with the exact list behind it — missing, doesn’t match, due soon. It also builds the first version of your company record, which is what the agents read.
Find my legal gaps — freeOr keep reading. The model that does the reasoning inside every endpoint, the network of licensed attorneys that reviews and trains it, and the whole thing running end to end on one real matter.